For just once, Oregon matters
Oregon's electorate - at least the portion made up of registered Democrats - will have a meaningful choice in the presidential primaries this year.
And that's indisputably a good thing.
Presidential candidate Barack Obama's visit to Portland and other parts of Oregon two weeks ago demonstrated the intensity of the public's interest in this presidential campaign. Obama filled Memorial Coliseum to near capacity Friday, and his soaring rhetoric showed why he has been such an exciting force in the 2008 election.
We are especially pleased to see Obama energize new voters in Oregon who otherwise might have ignored the state's May 20 primary.
And last week, Sen. Hillary Clinton rejuvinated her Oregon supporters with a stop in Hillsboro. Her husband also sent Clinton followers into a frenzy with several stops across the state preceeding Hillary's campaign event.
Now, with both Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton continuing to compete vigorously in Oregon, participation in the primary will increase beyond the disappointing levels of the past few May elections.
The Obama-Clinton contest will bring greater attention to other Democratic races, such as the primary battle between Jeff Merkley and Steve Novick, who are competing to run against Republican U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith in the fall.
In local elections throughout the state, where both partisan and nonpartisan races will be decided in May, a live presidential primary race will mean greater voter turnout among Democrats.
However, since Republicans already have settled on Sen. John McCain as their presidential nominee, there will be less excitement on the GOP side, and that could result in an Oregon electorate that skews ever more blue in May.
Look who's not coming to Oregon
While we are happy to see that Oregon's Democrats at least will have relevance this year, the sudden importance of this state's primary shouldn't mask the underlying problem with the way the nation chooses presidential candidates. Nor should it be used to justify Oregon's own archaic practices when it comes to presidential politics.
The lateness of this state's primary has kept Oregon on the presidential sidelines for decades. This year, Democrats have a choice between two strong candidates, but let's consider who isn't campaigning in Oregon this spring.
On the Democratic side, there will be no John Edwards or Bill Richardson (although he did show up to endorse Obama). Voters won't get an up-close look at Joe Biden, Chris Dodd or Dennis Kucinich.
For Republicans, the only choice is McCain - no Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney or even the ever-persistent Mike Huckabee.
And, of course, nonaffiliated voters will have no say whatsoever in the presidential primary, because Oregon's political parties continue to cling to an outdated system of closed primaries.
Earlier date, open primaries
The fact that Oregon will play a role in deciding between two finalists on the Democratic side is a definite improvement over past elections.
But without changes, Oregon will be back in its more familiar state of irrelevancy four years from now. To ensure the next presidential primary generates as much excitement as this one, Oregon should move that portion of its primary to an earlier date that still complies with the parties' rules.
And in a related matter, Oregon voters also should support a renewed attempt by former Secretary of State Phil Keisling to open the state's regular primary to all voters.
Although the open-primary initiative wouldn't apply directly to presidential elections, it would increase overall citizen interest in primaries.
The alternative is to hope that by some fluke Oregon's limited-participation primary still will matter in May. But that's likely to happen only once in a lifetime.