It’s time once again for the city of Milwaukie to take a hard look at protecting one of our greatest assets — trees.

by: 2010 FILE PHOTO: RAYMOND RENDLEMAN - Before being elected to City Council, Mike Miller joined a group trying to protect this 60-foot Western Red Cedar in his Lake Road neighborhood. In a work session on July 2, other members of City Council agreed that more tree rules were needed and directed city staff to schedule public-outreach events to prepare for drafting ordinances.Trees and their benefit to our environment through clean air and water are vital to a livable city. We have in this city many historic trees that lack protection, but which are very attractive and give the city of Milwaukie character and a sense of identity.

In Portland a new tree code was just completed. It took more than five years to complete. The goal as stated by Meryl Redish on The Oregonian opinion page, “Was to streamline regulations, improve customer service, protect trees better during development and, in general, ensure compliance.”

Their program was developed by citizen stakeholders. The goal was to provide a safety net for trees. Many years ago I was a member of a committee that put together a program in the city of Milwaukie to provide protections for our tree canopy and provide a process to preserve trees in the city.

I believe it is once again time to try to develop a program that will protect this precious resource.

By pulling together a group of citizens that can find consensus on this need we will be able to put together a program which will benefit all our residents. I also believe homeowners will be receptive to a program that increases their livability and home values. My hope is that through this process we can become a Tree City USA.

On a side note, don’t forget that businesses downtown are open and eager for your business even though construction has made it harder for you to get there. We need to give them our support.

Mike Miller

Milwaukie city councilor

Toxic environment unacceptable

Was very disheartened to hear of the poisoning of bumble bees in Wilsonville. Of course, I do not know anything beyond what the article in this newspaper last week quoted.

However, any chemical as lethal as what was used seems reckless and irresponsible to the situation. Not to forget the toxic load to the whole ecosystem, humans included. According to the article the fact that “wild bees are killed all the time in agricultural fields where nobody sees it happen” does not excuse anything and in fact makes it all the more serious. I consider it an invasion of my rights to enjoy a safe and healthy living environment.

We have to have a prescription in order to legally consume controlled substances/drugs, and yet toxic chemicals are sprayed into our environments without our permission and essentially against our will. I would also expect that when foliage has been treated with such a chemical that there is a notice/signage indicating such.

We all know there are other, less toxic ways to successfully treat aphids. What has happened is unacceptable. We need to do better.

I hope government will use this experience to take a leadership role in protecting when it comes to chemicals being sprayed in our communities. Besides the current “temporary” moratorium on the use of this chemical, I would like to hear what steps are being taken to prevent this from happening in future.

Robin Rasch


Metro’s obligations

The Metropolitan Service District (Metro) is charged to identify problems, begin to ask questions (conduct research), based on their research findings hypothesize and where appropriate conduct experiments in search of means to solving identified problems, reach conclusions after analyzing the data, communicate their findings and finally act on the results.

Libby Wentz writes (Letters, June 26), “Just because people do not buy into Metro’s agenda does not mean they are not intelligent enough to understand that the emperor has no new clothes.” Without apology: Frankly, that just doesn’t cut it!

What would work would be for the Libby Wentzs of Clackamas, Washington and Multnomah counties to take the problems that exist as we face the future, go through the same systematic steps that Metro does and give us their solutions to the problems. Our parents and their parents anted up and as a result we have the quality of life we have today. It’s our turn to ante up for our children and their children.

D. Kent Lloyd


Regional realities realized

Four years ago the economy collapsed. Since that time billions have been borrowed under the guise of stimulating the economy.

Metro failed to respond to the downturn, continuing to make promises that can’t be kept. For two years dedicated local citizens in Clackamas County have demanded that our tax money be carefully spent, and that government be held accountable. In spite of the ridiculous claims, we are not backwards isolationists or simpletons afraid of the future.

To those who feel they have no voice, please consider the following important changes that were primarily the result of effort by local citizens. Future light-rail projects will include a public vote, as will creation of any new urban-renewal districts.

Thanks primarily to citizen activists, the bloated CRC project was put on hold.

Most folks have no idea what Metro does, or how Metro affects their lives. As more become informed, Metro and TriMet will no longer be allowed to operate in a vacuum.

Les Poole

Oak Grove

Progress continues

The very nature of citizen involvement ensures that not everybody will be happy with the outcome. Hopefully many will be better informed.

It’s almost an axiom that those who are unhappy will make the most noise. That’s what we have going on here. Didn’t the “unhappy folks” lose a case before the Oregon Supreme Court the other day? Yes, they are very unhappy.

That is not to say that they are in the majority. I believe the majority in this case is simply remaining silent. They can see the light rail line being built, many will ride it, many will see it as progress.

As for the McLoughlin Plan of 1990, several options were considered, light rail, exclusive bus lanes, etc. between Milwaukie and Gladstone. A package of signal improvements, bikelanes, sidewalks, street lights was chosen as the preferred alternative. Some of those improvements in certain areas were made in following years, sadly others were ignored.

As an observer of the light-rail process, I was surprised that Milwaukie chose not to be at the end of the line. That would have been a terrific stimulus for economic development in the city. What was news? Milwaukie was short-sighted again. The decision to extend the line to Park Avenue was a second best. However, now I will be able to walk to the station even pulling a suitcase and ride to the airport, that’s great. I do not see the extension to Park Avenue as violating the McLoughlin Plan of 1990. That plan stopped at the Milwaukie city limits.

Parking impacts in the vicinity of the Park Avenue end of the line could have been greatly reduced by the construction of a parking structure. However it is largely the same crowd of light-rail opponents that railed against urban renewal, and succeeded, thus making the most likely financing source for such a structure impossible.

Dick Van Ingen

Oak Grove

More light-rail consequences

In last week’s Clackamas Review, David Jorling of Lake Oswego wrote an article called “Make leaders pay.” He thinks that John Ludlow and Tootie Smith should cover the lawsuit and not the taxpayers.

He makes a good point, except for one thing. John and Tootie are both on the side of the majority of Clackamas County taxpayer/voters. Mr. Jorling must have voted for the light-rail project. Both Milwaukie and Clackamas County voters have said no to this project for nearly 20 years, yet the project moves forward because our elected officials before John and Tootie became county commissioners, traded votes for campaign contributions. All they are trying to do is right the wrongs of the previous commission. Remember Charlotte Lehan and Jamie Damon lost their jobs in November because they did not support the majority of taxpayers in Clackamas County.

Also, last week an Oregon Tax Court judge visiting the Clackamas County Circuit Court ruled in favor of TriMet, saying that the county must honor the agreement. Judge Henry C. Breithaupt stated that Measure 3-401 only applies to future light-rail projects.

So he sided with the minority of Clackamas County voters. Remember last September passed by an overwhelming 61 to 39 percent margin. This measure is intended to include the current light-rail project (Orange Line). Those opposing this measure, after they lost, immediately claimed that this measure only applies to future light-rail projects. Again, they lied.

I think that it is time for the voters of Clackamas County to send a strong message, that if you want to keep your job, you’d better listen to the majority of voters.

Jeff Molinari


Shout out for civility

I was riding the train into Clackamas when a heavyset man suddenly whipped out a TriMet ID saying he is an employee of TriMet and loudly and aggressively demanding this young girl sitting directly behind me turn off her music.

I could barely hear the music and it wasn’t unpleasant. He berated her in a rude and obnoxious manner in front of the entire car. She protested his manner saying he could have asked nicely. Someone yelled “No one was complaining.”

The loud conversation he was having with his companion was far more disturbing and I resented his polluting the air with his anger and hostility.

The girl was attractive and well dressed. Her appearance and manner demonstrated she clearly did not have an attitude. She did not warrant being humiliated by this lout.

This man was clearly a bully abusing his position, something I’m sure TriMet would never approve of.

TriMet needs to take steps to discourage their employees misbehaving like this.

John Freeman


We welcome submissions from readers on local issues for our Opinion page. Please send your thoughts by noon Friday to Raymond Rendleman at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Keep Letter to the Editor submissions under 400 words; longer submissions will be considered for Community Soapboxes. Submissions may be edited for length, grammar, libel and appropriate taste. Letters must be accompanied by a full name, a telephone number and street address for verification purposes. Readers are also invited to call 503-546-0742 with story ideas and comments.

Contract Publishing

Go to top
Template by JoomlaShine