Tigard ballot measure may create transit gridlock
As we read over Ballot Measure 34-210 in Tigard and consider its potential impact not only on Tigard but on all of Washington County, we believe its critically important to weigh in.
The ballot title of Tigards Measure 34-210 which will appear on the citys special election ballot March 11 reads as follows: Shall Tigard adopt a public policy opposing high-capacity transit corridor projects unless voter authorization is obtained? Note that under this measure, the citys default position would be to just say no to mass-transit ideas.
If Tigard voters support this measure, the city would immediately be on record as having a declared public policy of opposing any construction of new high-capacity transit corridors within the city, unless voter approval is first obtained.
The measure defines a high-capacity transit corridor as any portion of a regional transit system within the city that reduces available road capacity in favor of light rail, rail transit or exclusive bus lanes.
And the measure goes to great lengths to keep transit options at bay: It would prohibit the city from amending comprehensive plan or land-use regulations to accommodate a transit corridor project unless the public says yes in advance via a special election.
Even more extreme, the measure would compel the city of Tigard to send letters to a series of public officials, every year, to provide notice of the citys opposition to transit projects. These letters would go to the governor, the director of the Oregon Department of Transportation, the Washington County Board of Commissioners, Metro councilors, the TriMet Governing Board and even to the director of the Federal Transit Administration.
Wow. With this aggressive approach, its difficult to imagine any transportation grants and the hundreds of construction and operator jobs that go with them would be coming Tigards way any time soon.
There are a multitude of reasons why requiring a public vote before going ahead with a regional transit project is a bad idea, but we believe the primary reason is this: If any one jurisdiction in a larger network in effect has veto power over a project, the result would be planning gridlock. Remember, if Tigard can grant itself this power, whats to prevent any and every other municipality across the region from demanding the same clout?
By their nature, transit systems are linear. In general, transit routes radiate out of population centers and go to other population centers. Currently, for example, a proposal to link Portland and Tualatin with a new transit line as part of the Southwest Corridor Plan is under consideration. But to get to Tualatin, the route from Portland must pass through a number of separate communities, including Tigard.
Under the system that proponents of this ballot measure are in essence proposing, even if four of these five communities see the benefits of enhancing their mass transit connections and want the service, if any one community along the way does not want it and votes no, the plan might have to be dropped. That would not be fair to neighboring towns and citizens.
Also, elections take time and money. They have to be scheduled months in advance. By definition, planning would be on hold until the elections are held. That means more delay, and that typically results in more cost for a project if the project is indeed approved by voters.
Its interesting to note that in November 2012, Tigard voters approved Ballot Measure 34-203, which requires a public vote before any new taxes or fees could be authorized for light-rail construction. Since approval by Tigards citizens is already necessary before any local funds can be directed toward light rail, thats all the more reason we question the motivation for this measure.
We believe Ballot Measure 34-210 is a recipe for chaos, and not just for Tigard but potentially for all of Washington County. We hope Tigards voters soundly reject it.Add a comment