Improvements aside, many say current policies still hurt low-income riders

After years of fare increases and service reductions, TriMet is holding fares steady and increasing service throughout the region.

But that doesn’t mean everyone is happy about it. And even the TriMet Board of Directors is puzzled about the best way to improve service in the future.

Bus rider advocates say the regional transit agency didn’t need to raise rates and cut service last year. They say TriMet is currently projected to run a $20 million surplus this year, which proves last year’s deficit predictions were unfounded.

The advocates also complain TriMet is not doing enough now to help those most hurt by its earlier decisions. And they do not believe the service improvements approved and proposed to date help low-income riders.

“TriMet can and should improve service, but that doesn’t help those who were hurt the most by the fare increases,” says Jared Franz, the law and policy associate with the OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon advocacy organization.

TriMet officials disagree. They say the fare increases and service cuts were necessary to stabilize the agency’s finances, which were undermined by the Great Recession. They also deny the current budget includes a

$20 million surplus, arguing the agency has numerous unfunded liabilities and an aging bus fleet that needs to be replaced.

In addition, TriMet still has not resolved its long-running contract dispute with the union that represents most of its workers. Although the state Employment Relations Board upheld the contract imposed by an arbitrator earlier this year, Amalgamated Transit Union 757 recently appealed that ruling to the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Despite the uncertainty created by the appeal, the TriMet board has approved and is considering a number of service improvements. The budget that took effect on July 1 includes

$2.1 million in service restorations and additions that took effect in September. TriMet management also has proposed spending an additional $2.8 million to increase service on 10 of the agency’s most heavily used lines. And TriMet staff is working on plans to reconfigure routes in Washington and Multnomah counties.

New transfer policy sought

But Franz says TriMet also needs to change the transfer policy it adopted last year before doing anything else. The new policy says single-purchase $2.50 tickets are only good for two hours. Franz says that needs to be increased to three hours, and until the end of the service day after 7 p.m.

That is the Campaign for a Fair Transfer proposal being pushed by Bus Riders Unite, which is supported by OPAL. Franz says it will help riders who cannot complete their business in just two hours and now must buy one or more additional tickets every day.

OPAL also argues the new ticket printers in all TriMet buses have decreased transfer times from three to two hours on weekends, a change TriMet says is not an intentional fare increase.

According to Franz, TriMet data shows the majority of the riders hurt by the two-hour transfer limit are low-income and people of color. A TriMet analysis says such a change could reduce expected revenue by between $2 million and $3 million, however.

The pushback helped prompt the TriMet board to postpone approving the frequent service restorations at its Sept. 25 meeting. TriMet General Manager Neal McFarlane argued the board needed to approve the restorations then so the agency could implement them next March. But instead, the board unanimously voted to table the resolution.

Most board members said they wanted to consider the restorations together with OPAL’s proposal and a new Strategic Financial Plan expected to be completed by their Nov. 27 meeting. The plan is being written to help prioritize future spending.

“I’m very interested in the frequent service proposal, but we need to look at it and the transfer policy in the larger context of the Strategic Financial Plan,” said board member Craig Prosser, who recently retired as Tigard’s city manager.

Many hands grab at surplus

The delay proves an old political adage: It is frequently harder to increase government spending than to cut it. The competition for available funds can be so fierce that policymakers have a hard time pleasing everyone.

In TriMet’s case, the situation is complicated by the unresolved labor dispute. After negotiations over the last contract broke down, a state-approved arbitrator imposed TriMet’s final offer last year. ATU 757 appealed that decision to the state Employment Relations Board, which upheld it. Now the union has appealed the ERB decision to the Oregon Court of Appeals, which could reverse both decisions.

The appeal raises questions about the starting point of the new contract negotiations that are just beginning. And it is unclear if TriMet would have to reimburse the union’s members for unpaid raises and increased health care benefit costs if that happens.

The uncertainty does not matter to OPAL, however. OPAL believes last year’s fare increases and service cuts disproportionately hurt the poor, and it has focused on the transfer policy change as the solution.

Contract Publishing

Go to top
Template by JoomlaShine