Endorsement of Measure 91, which would legalize recreational use of marijuana in Oregon, will be considered by the City Club of Portland.

A City Club panel released a recommendation, which members will decide by Aug. 25. Official stands on selected ballot measures will be disclosed Aug. 26.

The City Club is Oregon’s most prestigious civic forum.

The report released Thursday says in part:

“Current marijuana laws unnecessarily limit adult Oregonians’ freedom to consume a product that is less addictive than legal products such as alcohol and tobacco.

“The social costs of the current system are too high; crime can be reduced through regulated legalization; consumption can be discouraged through education and advertising; economic opportunity will increase through added revenue and job growth.”

But the recommendation was not unanimous. Elisa Dozono, a Portland lawyer who led the panel, says the measure leaves regulatory shortcomings and the issue can be better handled at the federal level.

Thursday’s report is the final on five statewide ballot measures up in the Nov. 4 election. The club did not issue reports on two others: Measure 87, which allow for some outside employment by judges, and Measure 90, which provides for a top-two primary.

Voters in Washington and Colorado passed legalization in 2012. Retail sales began Jan. 1 in Colorado, and July 8 in Washington.

Measure 91 qualified by initiative petition, the third since 1986.

It is modeled on the other states in that details would be left to the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. Retail sales would start no earlier than July 1, 2016.

“Legalization of recreational marijuana will pose many challenges at first, but over time, Oregon will find that it is better off than under the current prohibition,” says Ari Wubbold, vice chairman of the City Club panel.

“Legalization will help address crime in a number of ways: Revenue will help fund law enforcement and drug education initiatives, a black market industry will be placed under strict regulation, and police resources will be freed up to focus on more dangerous criminals.”

Joining Wubbold in support of an endorsement are Beth van Elswyk, Glenn Fee, Matthew Keenen, Mario Parker-Mulligan, Jonathan Poisner and Rick York.

Clifford Droke was the panel’s research adviser.

Alaska also will vote on a legalization measure Nov. 4.

Oregon voters rejected a different legalization ballot measure in 2012. The City Club took no stand, but it sponsored a Friday Forum on the measure.

Voters rejected a 2010 measure for the state to license dispensaries for medical marijuana. The City Club opposed it. Lawmakers passed a different version in 2013.

Oregon was the first state where lawmakers approved decriminalization of possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, back in 1973. About one-third of the states, excluding Washington and Colorado, have similar laws.

It was among the first states, in 1998, to approve marijuana for medicinal uses. There are 23 such states.

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, and it is classified as a drug with no accepted medical uses.

Dozono, in her dissent, says the measure will result in too many uncertainties.

“While adopting the proposal will expand the volume of marijuana grown and distributed, it will not curtail the black market…. An unlimited number of licenses can be issued and key employees are not subject to scrutiny and restriction.

“The initiative appears driven not by a legitimate urgency to remedy flaws in the legal system, but rather an opportunistic attempt to take advantage of shifts in the political winds of public opinion.”

Recommended positions on the measures and presentations on the issues will take place at a City Club forum from 5:30 to 9 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 20, in the Village Ballroom at Oregon Public House, 700 NE Dekum St., Portland. The public is invited, but only City Club members may vote on recommendations.

A link to the City Club of Portland’s report on Measure 91 and the majority and minority stances:

The City Club also is releasing a report on privatization of liquor sales now handled by the state, although sponsors chose not to proceed with a ballot measure this year. A link to that report:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

(503) 385-4899

Contract Publishing

Go to top
Template by JoomlaShine